CEP Files “No-Fees” Direct Testimony with CPUC (10.5.12)

CEP Director proposes:

1. No fees or costs for opt-outs from customers

2. An audit of costs and revenues claimed by the utilities for the opt-out program

3. Demonstrated, cost-efficient handling of opt-outs

4. Costs paid for by company and its investors

5. That CPUC oversight be examined

6. Smart meters and smart grid unsafe, unreliable, and improperly planned

7. Opt-out customers not be harassed with new rules or practices that appear to be designed to make them switch back to smart meters.

(S. Brinchman, CEP Director, Oct. 5, 2012)

 

WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO JOIN CEP AS A SUPPORTING MEMBER!

 YOUR DONATION OF ANY AMOUNT WILL HELP US CONTINUE OUR EFFORTS!

 

To view all legal filings pertaining to the PG&E, SDG&E, and SCE opt-out proceedings, now consolidated, as of May, 2012

go to:  http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/advancedsearchform.aspx

and enter (only) the proceeding number below for the proceeding you are interested in, then click Search. You will then see many pages of documents filed, in chronological order, by all Parties.

PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) Opt-out Proceeding Number:  A1103014

SDG&E (San Diego Gas & Electric) Opt-out Proceeding Number:  A1103015

SCE (Southern California Edison) Opt-out Proceeding Number: A1107020

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Copyright Center for Electrosmog Prevention 2011-2019